urning the Instrument
over we see the innermost Lines on its other face, called Polygraphic
from their principal use, which is to describe on a given line figures having
as many equal sides (and angles) as required. This is easily done by taking
with a compass the length of the given line and fitting it to the points marked
6-6; next, without changing the Instrument, we take the distance between the
points marked with the same number as the number of sides of the figure we wish
to draw. For instance, to describe a [regular] figure of 7 sides we take the
distance between points 7-7, which will be the radius of the circle containing
the heptagon to be drawn. Place one leg of the compass first at one end and
then at the other end of the given line and trace with it a short intersection
of arcs; then taking this as center we shall describe with the same compass-opening
a faint circle. Passing through the ends of the given line, this will contain
that line exactly 7 times inside its circumference, whereby the heptagon is
drawn.
ith these lines
the circumference can be divided into many parts, working by the converse of
the preceding operation. Take the radius of the given circle and fit it to the
number designating the parts into which the circle is to be divided; then take
always the distance between points 6-6 [on the Polygraphic Lines so separated]
and this will divide the circumference into the desired [number of] parts.
hese Tetragonic
Lines are so called from their principal use, which is to square all regular
areas and the circle as well, which is done by an easy operation. For when we
wish to construct a square equal to a given circle, all we have to do is to
take its radius with a compass, and opening the Instrument fit this to the two
points along the Tetragonic Lines marked by two tiny circles; then, not moving
the Instrument, if you take on the compass the distance between the points marked
4-4 on those Lines, you will have the side of a square equal [in area] to the
given circle. Likewise if you want the side of the pentagon, or the hexagon,
equal to the same circle, you will take the distance between points 5-5, or
6-6; for they are respectively the sides of the pentagon and the hexagon equal
to that same circle.
Moreover if we want the converse (given a square
or other regular polygon, to find a circle equal to it), we take one side of
the given polygons and fit it to the points of the Tetragonic Lines corresponding
to the number of sides of the given figure; then, without moving the Instrument,
take the distance between the little circle marks, and by making this the radius
you will describe the circle equal to the given polygon. In conclusion, you
can in this way find the side of any regular figure that is equal to any other.
For example, we wish to construct an octagon equal to a given pentagon [both
regular]. The Instrument is set so that the side of the given pentagon fits
at points 5-5, and without changing the Instrument the distance between points
8-8 will give the side of the octagon sought.
olution of the
present problem depends on the preceding one and on Operation 10, explained
before. Let there be given to us a circle, a triangle, a pentagon, and a hexagon;
we are asked to find one square equal to all the said figures [combined]. First,
by the preceding operation we find separately four squares, equal to the given
four figures; then, by Operation 10, we find a single square equal to those
four, which will doubtless be equal to all four given figures.
he present operation
is no less useful than interesting, showing us not just the way to square all
irregular [rectilineal] figures, but how to reduce them either to a circle or
to any other regular figure you like. Since every rectilineal figure is resolvable
into triangles," once we can make a square equal to any triangle we shall make
separately individual squares, equal to each of the triangles into which the
given rectilineal figure is resolved, and then by Operation 10 we reduce all
these squares into a single square, and obviously the square will have been
found that is equal to the given rectilineal figure. By means of the Tetragonic
Lines we can at will convert that square in turn into a circle, a pentagon,
or any other regular rectilineal figure. Thus the solution of the present question
is reduced to our having to find a square equal to any given triangle, which
you will have very easily from the ensuing lemma.

et it be proposed
to make a square equal to the given triangle ABC. Draw to one side two lines
at right angles, DE and FG; then take a proportional compass of which one end
opens to double the other and hold one of the longer legs at corner A; open
the other leg until, when rotated, it just grazes the opposite line BC. Now
invert the [proportional] compass and mark with the shorter legs the distance
FH, which will be half the perpendicular that falls from angle A on the opposite
side BC. This done, take line BC with the longer legs and carry this to FI;
holding one leg at point I, move the other out to point H. Again inverting the
compass, without further widening or narrowing it, mark with the short legs
the distance IK, and holding one of their points at K let the other cut the
vertical FG at point L. Thus we now have line LF, which is the side of the square
that is equal to triangle ABC. Notice that although we have set forth this operation
as performed linearly without the Instrument, that is not because this could
not also be easily found on the Instrument. For if we wished to reduce some
triangle to a square, as for instance triangle ABC, then taking the vertical
that falls from angle A upon the opposite side BC we would see how many graduations
this contains along the Arithmetic scale, as say 45, and fit that distance crosswise
to points 45-45 on the Geometric Lines; then taking half the line BC we would
see likewise how many graduations along the Arithmetic Lines it contains; finding
it to contain, say, 37, we then take crosswise on the Geometric Lines the distance
between points 37-37, which would give us line LF, the square on which will
equal triangle ABC.

here remain finally
the Added Lines, so called
because they add to the Tetragonic Lines what with those was left to be desired-that
is, a way of squaring segments of circles and the more specifically explained
below. These Added Lines are other figures mentioned in the heading above, which
will be marked with two series of numbers, of which the outer series begins
at this mark D followed by the numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, and so on out to 18. The
inner series begins from this mark going on then to 1, 2, 3, 4, and so on, also
out to 18. By means of these Lines we can (for the first time) square any given
segment of a circle not more than a semicircle. In order that this may be better
understood, their use will be explained by example.
We wish, for instance, to find the square equal to the segment of a circle,
ABC. Bisect its chord AC at point D, and take the distance DC with a compass.
Opening the Instrument, fit this across the points marked DD, and leaving the
Instrument at this setting, take next the altitude of the segment (that is,
line DB) and see at which points of the outer scale this fits crosswise. Let
this be, say, at points 2-2. This done, we must next take with the compass the
the distance between points 2-2 of the inner scale and form our square on a
line of that length, which [square] will be equal to the segment ABC. Now if
we have an area contained by two segments of circles with a common chord, as
in the next diagram ABCD, we could easily reduce this to a square by drawing
the chord AC which divides this figure into two circular segments, whereupon
by the rule already given there are found two squares equal to the two separate
segments which by recourse to Operation 10 are reduced to a single square, completing
the task.
By a not dissimilar operation we can also square
any sector of a circle; for drawing the chord of its arc cuts that into one
circular segment and one triangle, two parts which can easily be reduced to
two squares by the things already taught, and those two then [reduced] to a
single square.
Finally it remains for us to show how the same
Lines can serve us to square a segment larger than a semicircle, or a trapezium
contained by two straight lines and two arcs (like that in the next figure,
ABCD), or the lune similar to X; all of which operations have the same resolution.
As to the segment larger than a semicircle, if we square the excluded smaller
segment in the foregoing manner, and subtract such a square from the square
equal to the entire circle, the square equal to the difference will obviously
be equal to the larger segment of the circle. Likewise, having found the square
equal to the whole segment BAFDC and subtracted from this the square equal to
the segment AFD, the remainder will equal the trapezium [ABCD]. And proceeding
similarly for the lune X, draw the common chord of the two segments of circles
and take separately the squares equal to those two segments; their difference
will be the square equal to the lime. As to finding the difference between two
given squares and reducing this to another square, that was explained by use
of the Geometric Lines in Operation 11.